|
Sign-on : The WTO’s Doha Round Will Not Solve the Global Food Crisis – Time for Real Solutions
From OWINFS - Our World is Not For Sale
We request all organizations concerned about the Food crisis and which reject the hypocritical hijacking of the crisis to attempt to push through a Doha Round of WTO expansion that has yet to be able to be concluded on its own "merits", to endorse the attached letter, which is in English, Spanish, and French.
Please send endorsements to Anuradha Mittal at the Oakland Institute, at
This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it
as soon as possible.
Thank you,
Deborah James, Anuradha Mittal, and Carin Smaller, and all the contributories from the OWINFS Agriculture Working Group
To: Trade Ministers and Agriculture Ministers
CC: Pascal Lamy, Director-General, WTO
Robert Zoellick, President, World Bank
Dominique Strauss-Kahn, Managing Director, International Monetary Fund
Angel Gurría, Secretary General, Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
Subject: The WTO’s Doha Round Will Not Solve the Global Food Crisis – Time for Real Solutions
Dear Minister,
The global food system is in crisis. Millions of people can no longer
afford or access the food they need, increasing global hunger and
malnutrition. The worlds’ governments need to act now. But the answer
does not lie in deeper deregulation of food production and trade. We,
concerned non-governmental organizations and social movements, urge you
to reject the claims by the leaders of the World Trade Organization
(WTO), World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the
Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), that
concluding the Doha Round is a solution to the current crisis.1
We believe the Doha Round as is currently envisioned will intensify the
crisis by making food prices more volatile, increasing developing
countries’ dependence on imports, and strengthening the power of
multinational agribusiness in food and agricultural markets. Developing
countries are likely to lose further policy space in their agriculture
sector, which would in turn limit their ability to deal with the
current crisis and to strengthen the livelihoods of small producers.
The inability to manage the current food crisis is an illustration of
the failure of three decades of market deregulation in agriculture. We
need a new model for the trading system that puts development,
employment and food security objectives at the centre. We are calling
for real solutions that will stabilize food production and distribution
to meet the global demand for healthy, adequate, and affordable food.
Governments must start to take a long-term view of the challenges
facing agriculture. The recent report of the International Assessment
of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development
[IAASTD], endorsed by 60 countries, says, “Modern agriculture has
brought significant increases in food production. But the benefits have
been spread unevenly and have come at an increasingly intolerable
price, paid by small-scale farmers, workers, rural communities and the
environment”. Support has to be directed at a different model of
agriculture that can sustainably meet the needs of a growing population.
The WTO’s Doha Round and other bilateral and regional trade agreements
currently under negotiation will not solve the food crisis, for the
following reasons:
1. Existing WTO and bilateral and regional trade agreements push across
the board liberalization, which worsens volatility of food prices. This
leads to increased dependence on international markets and decreased
investment in local food production. Trade liberalization has eroded
the ability of a number of developing countries to feed themselves, for
example, Mexico, Bangladesh, Indonesia and Mali. The removal of tariff
barriers has resulted in dumping of heavily subsidized commodities in
developing countries, such as Ghana, Kenya, the Philippines, Jamaica
and Honduras, while undermining local food production.
Developing countries have turned from net exporters of food to net
importers of food.2 Two-thirds of developing countries are net food
importers and are extremely vulnerable to volatile world food prices.
The current proposals under the Doha Round will increase countries’
dependence on food imports while further eroding their ability to feed
their own populations.
2. High food prices provide enormous benefits to transnational
agribusinesses and commodity cartels that control the trade in food and
agriculture. One of the largest global grain traders, Cargill,
announced in April 2008 that its third quarter profits rose 86 percent
to US$1.03 billion, in the midst of the global food crisis.3 Bunge saw
its profits in the last quarter of 2007 increase by 77 percent compared
with the same period in 2006. Archer Daniel Midland’s (ADM’s) profits
in 2007 rose by 65 percent.4 The Doha Round will strengthen the
position of transnational companies in agricultural markets, who thrive
on market deregulation.
3. The Doha negotiations do not tackle the major challenges facing the
global food system, which include climate change, natural resource
depletion, the quadrupling of oil prices, the lack of competition in
world commodity markets, financial speculation and the rapid expansion
of unsustainable agrofuels production.
We believe what is needed to solve the food crisis is the following:
1. Governments and communities need to have a range of tools at their
disposal to build resilient food and agricultural systems that are
ready for the challenges that lie ahead. This includes a greater
emphasis on policies that increase food sovereignty, encourage local
investment in local markets, support sustainable small-scale farming,
safeguard local production from dumping, implement genuine agrarian
reform, and allow trade instruments such as quotas and tariffs. Some of
these instruments are being proposed by a group of 46 developing
countries—known as the G33—in the WTO’s negotiations on Special
Products and Special Safeguard Mechanism.
2. The volatility of agricultural prices must be addressed through
national policies and global actions to avert food crises and to ensure
small producers a reliable and steady income. Well-managed public
stocks need to be re-established. Such stocks provide an important
buffer against price volatility and food insecurity. Speculation and
extremely high prices forced upon consumers by traders and retailers
must be controlled. At the WTO, the African group has a long-standing
proposal on the need to allow commodity-producing countries to make
agreements among themselves in order to stabilize prices. This proposal
deserves further attention.
3. Governments should establish safety nets and public distribution
systems to prevent widespread hunger. Governments have to provide
financial support for the poorest consumers to allow them to eat.
Governments must use the maximum of available resources within the
State and from the international community.
4. A reform of the food aid system to respond more rapidly and to allow
greater flexibility in the delivery of food aid. Instead of dumping
surplus agricultural production as “in kind” food aid, donors should
provide cash to governments and aid agencies to buy local food.
5. Developing countries should not commit to financial services
liberalization in the context of the General Agreement on Trade in
Services (GATS) or bilateral and regional trade negotiations, as this
can adversely impact farmers’ access to financial services such as
insurance and credit.
We look forward to discussing these issues further with you, and to seeing real solutions to the global food crisis.
Sincerely,
International and Regional Networks
------------------------------------------------------------------
1 At the WTO’s General Council and Trade Negotiating Committee (TNC),
the Director-General, Pascal Lamy, said “we have all witnessed the
financial turbulence we are in and the hikes in energy and food prices
that are affecting severely many of your countries. At a time when the
world economy is in rough waters, concluding the Doha Round can provide
a strong anchor.” Mr. Lamy has argued that the continuous expansion of
multilateral trade is an insurance policy against market instabilities
and financial turbulences. The President of the World Bank and former
U.S. Trade Representative, Robert Zoellick, argued in a speech at the
Center for Global Development, that a key solution to the food crisis
“is to break the Doha Development Agenda impasse.” He said, “A fairer
and more open global trading system for agriculture will give more
opportunities – and confidence – to African and other developing
country farmers to expand production.” Similarly, Dominique
Strauss-Kahn, Managing Director of the IMF, wrote in an opinion in the
Financial Times, “no one should forget that all countries rely on open
trade to feed their populations. […] Completing the Doha round would
play a critically helpful role in this regard, as it would reduce trade
barriers and distortions and encourage agricultural trade.” Finally,
the Secretary General of the OECD, Angel Gurría, wrote in an opinion
piece in the International Herald Tribune, “Governments around the
world face weakening economies and soaring food prices. Amid the
hand-wringing, an important and immediate step they can take to help
would be to agree on a new multilateral trade deal.”
See http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news08_e/gc_chair_tnc_7may08_e.htm;
http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news08_e/tnc_17apr08_e.htm;
http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/sppl_e/sppl88_e.htm;
http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/sppl_e/sppl85_e.htm;
http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/NEWS/0,,contentMDK:21711307~pagePK:34370~piPK:42770~theSitePK:4607,00.html;
Financial Times, COMMENT: A global approach is required to tackle high
food prices, By Dominique Strauss-Kahn, Apr 21, 2008; International
Herald Tribune, Trade Agreement Needed Now, By Angel Gurría, April 25,
2008
2 A food trade surplus of US$1.9 billion in the 1970’s was transformed
into a US$17.6 billion deficit in 2000 and a US$9.3 billion deficit in
2004. Excluding Brazil, the figures are even more drastic: A food trade
surplus of US$1.6 billion was transformed into a deficit of US$26.1
billion by 2004. The cereal import bill for low-income food deficit
countries in 2007 reached over US$38 billion. According to FAO
projections, by the year 2030, the net food trade deficit of developing
countries is expected to swell to more than US$50 billion.
3 Cited in The Star Tribune
4 Making a Killing from Hunger, Grain, April 2008
|