Massive numbers of Europeans arrived to the Latin American and North American countries, without any visas or conditions imposed by the authorities. They were always welcomed, and they still are, in our countries of the American continent, which were able to absorb Europeans economic hardship and political crisis. They came to our continent to exploit natural resources and to transfer them to Europe, with an extremely high cost to the original American population.  As in the case of our "Cerro Rico" in Potosí and its fabulously wealthy silver mines, that allowed massive monetary infusions to the European continent from the sixteenth to the nineteenth century. The people, the properties and the rights of the European immigrants were always respected.

Today, the European Union is the principal destination of immigrants of the world, due to its positive image as a space of prosperity and of public liberties. A vast majority of these immigrants come to the European Union to contribute to this prosperity, and not to take advantage of it. They take the jobs that the Europeans cannot or do not want to do, such as in public works, construction, and various kind of services including health care. They also contribute to the demographic dynamics of the European continent, balancing the relation between active and retired workers and contributing to their generous social security systems, strengthening the internal market and social cohesion. The immigrants offer a solution to the European Union demographic and financial problems. For us, our immigrants represent the development aid that the Europeans do not give us, given that very few reach the goal of giving 0.7% of their GDP in development aid. In 2006 Latin America received 68 billion dollars in remittances, which is more than the total amount of foreign direct investment in our countries. At the global level, these remittances have reached 300 billion dollars, and amount that far surpasses the 104 billion dollars given as development aid. My own country, Bolivia, received more that 10% of our GDP in remittances (1.1 billion dollars), which represents a third of our natural gas annual exports.
 
In other words, the migratory flows are of benefit to the Europeans and, in a marginal way, to us in the third world, mainly because we also  lose a contingent of qualified workforce, people in which our poor countries, in one  way or another, have invested human and financial resources.
 
Sadly, the "Return Directive" Project worsens terribly this reality. Considering that every State or group of States can define their migratory policies in a sovereign manner, we cannot accept that the fundamental human rights of our fellow citizens and Latin-American brothers and sisters be denied. The "Return Directive" includes the possibility of an 18-month imprisonment of undocumented immigrants - or "distance", as the term used in the directive- before their expulsion. 18 months!
 
Without a fair trial or justice! As it is today, the project of the directive clearly violates articles 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of the Human Rights Declaration of 1948.
 
Specially article 13 of the Declaration that state:  "1. Every person has the right to circulate freely and to choose its residence in the territory of a State.   2. Every person has the right to leave any country, even its own, and to return to its country."

But worst of all, there is the possibility of detaining and jailing mothers and minors, without taking into account their family or school situation, in these custody centers where we know people suffer from depressions, hunger strikes and suicides. How can we accept, without reacting, that our fellow citizens and Latin-American brothers and sisters be concentrated in camps, the vast majority of whom have been working and integrating for years? On which side does duty of the humanitarian aid find itself today? Where are the freedoms of movement and the protections against arbitrary imprisonment?
 
At the same time the European Union is trying to convince the  Andean Community of Nations (Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru) to sign an  "Association Agreement" that includes in its third pillar a Free Trade  Agreement, which has the same nature and content as the agreements imposed by the by the  United States.
 
We are under intense pressure of the European Commission to accept conditions and deep liberalizations in trade, financial services, intellectual property and public services. Moreover, in the name of "legal protection" we are being pressured because of the nationalizations of our water, gas and telecommunication sectors undertaken on International Workers Day. I ask myself, in this case, where is the "legal security" for our women, youth, children and workers that searched for better horizons in Europe?
 
The promotion of the free circulation for goods and finances, when we see before us imprisonment without fair trail for our brothers and sisters that sought freely circulate. This is a denial of the fundamental bases of liberty and of democratic rights.
 
Under these conditions, if this "Return Directive" is approved we would find ourselves in the a position wherein it would be ethically impossible to deepen the negotiations with the European Union, and we would reserve the right to impose to the European citizens the same visa obligations that are imposed to the Bolivians since April 1st, 2007, in accordance with the principle of diplomatic reciprocity. We have not yet exercised this principle, precisely because we expect positive responses from the European Union.

The world, its continents, oceans and poles now face important global difficulties: global warming, contamination; the slow but certain disappearance of energy resources and of biodiversity; while hunger and poverty increase in all countries, weakening our societies. To make immigrants, documented or not, the scapegoats of these global problems, is not a solution. It does not correspond to any reality.

The problems of social cohesion that Europe suffers are not the fault of immigrants, but are the result of the development model imposed by the north, which destroys the planet and dismembers human societies. In the name of the people of Bolivia and of all my brothers and sisters from the continent and from the regions of the world, as the Maghreb and the African countries, I call on the conscience of the European leaders, members of the European Parliament, and the people, citizens and activists of Europe, to not approve the text of the "Return Directive". As it is known today, it is a directive of shame. I also call to the European Union to draft in the upcoming months a migratory policy that respects human rights, allows the maintenance of the beneficial dynamics for both continents, and that redresses, for once and for all, the huge economic, ecological and historical debts that the European countries have with great part of the Third World, closing, finally, the still open veins of Latin America. Europe cannot today fail with their "integration policies", as they failed in the past with their so-called "civilizing mission" in colonial times.

Receive all of you, authorities, European congressmen, fellow men and women, fraternal greetings from Bolivia. And in particular, our solidarity to all the "clandestine".

Evo Morales Ayma
President of the Republic of Bolivia