|
• Eminent Persons’ team visit Sardar Sarovar affected areas in Narmada Valley for fact finding • Public Hearings in 3 States exposes the blatant violations of law and rehabilitation policy
There was an air of investigation in the Narmada Valley when the Sardar Sarovar affected people disposed in the Public Hearings in the 3 States – M.P., Maharashtra and Gujarat, held by a team of eminent and concerned citizens of India. The panel that undertook the serious exercise if fact finding through hearings consisted of Shri L.C. Jain, former member of Planning Commission and former Indian High Commission to South Africa, Shri S.C. Behar, former Chief Secretary of State of M.P., Shri Bharat Chhaparwal, former Vice–Chancellor of Indore University, Prof. Krishna Mazumdar, Delhi University, Prof Johannes Manjrekar, M.S. University, Vadodara (Gujarat), Shri S.G. Vombatkere, Major General (Retd), Smt Devaki Jain, noted Feminist, writer and activist and Adv. N.D. Suryavanshi, Dhule (Maharashtra).
Hearing at Parveta R&R site (Gujarat)
At Parveta R&R site (Vadodara district), the Team commenced its
hearing of the woes and tales narrated by the Sardar Sarovar affected
adivasis of Gujarat who were resettled more than 15 years ago but were
yet to be rehabilitated. Representatives from more than 25 R&R
sites around Gujarat were present for the hearing to speak their minds
even as a large contingent of police force made its presence felt.
Raijibhai of Kamboikuva R&R site spoke about the obvious
callousness and insensitivity of the Gujarat government and officials
towards the oustees of Gujarat even as they boasted of national
interest and huge benefits coupled with the formulation and
implementation of an ideal R&R policy.
Oustees spoke of recent developments where the land of more than 150
adivasis being taken back by the government, about 15 years after it
was allotted to them. Others narrated tales of destitution due to the
uncultivable lands infested with dabh grass and waterlogging, while
others lamented the fact that the lands allotted were still
unirrigated. The women spoke of the hardships that they were facing and
especially were despondent of the fact that they had been reduced to
daily-wage workers in the fields of the Patels to eke out an existence.
It was indeed tragic to note that those, whose sacrifice was claimed in
the name of ‘water’, faced serious water problems at the R&R sites
where handpumps were inadequate and/or not working for months and
borewells lay defunct due to electricity load shedding. Shri L.C. Jain,
on behalf of the panelists, expressed hope that the Gujarat government
will listen to the people and suggested resorting to Gram Sabha
resolutions to bring out the truth against official propaganda.
Hearing at Chimalkhedi, Maharashtra
The Team proceeded to the dam site and from there, along with officials
of the Revenue and Narmada Departments of Govt. of Maharashtra, reached
Chimalkhedi in a barge. Chimalkhedi, a place of Satyagraha this
monsoon, has been affected since 1993 with the lands and houses of
numerous adivasis already submerged by the dam waters. Hundreds of
adivasis from about 20 submergence affected villages and 5 R&R
sites in Maharashtra were present to place on record their reality.
Noorji Vasave, an adivasi youth spoke of the exercise, which he termed
as most critical for all, where the authorities seem to be keen to
close the files and falsely claim that R&R of all PAFs affected at
the present dam height (122m) has been completed. The reality is that,
even at this present dam height, there remain more than 1100+ families
who are yet to be rehabilitated. These villages have been affected
since 1993 and yet, in violation of all principles of rehabilitation,
they were not rehabilitated. The representatives of Manibeli, Danel,
Bamani and Savariya stressed the fact that numerous hamlets were yet to
be surveyed and identified as areas to be marooned. The history of
identifying land was narrated by Noorji Padavi who insisted on
compliance with the Cabinet’s decision to allot 1500 hectares of
denuded forest land to the remaining oustees since very little private
land, in large chunks, is available and the total requirement of land
is more than 4000 hectares. Adivasis like Diwalya Lika came to the dais
to establish the fact that even 70 year old persons like himself, whose
lands and houses were already submerged, are left of the government
lists as ‘undeclared’ and hence not entitled to rehabilitation.
The officials represented by the Deputy Collector, Shri Vasave assured
that the finalization of lists would be done in the villages at the
earliest and the decision on more land of all categories will be taken
at the appropriate level. The plight of no or irregular services –
health, transport and ration shops – were presented with allegations of
doctors running away, rationshop grains being siphoned off or not
delivered on time, etc. respective department officials gave their
reasoning and solutions were discussed by all and noted. No raise in
dam height, till all the issues are resolved, was demanded by all
amidst slogans when Hatibai of Dhankhedi chided the officials not to
send police since help and no warning was offered when her house and
belongings drowned at midnight. Advocate N.D. Suryavanshi, appealed TO
THE officials to once and for all decide to resolve all differences
jointly with full participation of Andolan struggling for the past 22
years.
Hearing at Badwani (M.P.)
The next hearing was held at Badwani (M.P.), where hundreds of oustees
from affected villages in Dhar, Badwani and Jhabua districts attended
and whose representatives exposed the sham of rehabilitation on paper
being done by the MP government. Speaking first, Luharia Shankaria from
one of the first submergence villages of M.P., Jalsindhi, informed the
panelists that his village has faced submergence since 1994 and yet
rehabilitation has not been carried out. He condemned the callous
treatment of adivasis by the government that had failed to establish
even 1 R&R site in M.P. for the 26 affected villages in Jhabua
district.
Shri Ashish Mandloi, oustee from village Chotta Barda and activist of
NBA, laid out the present situation before the panelists stating that
177 villages were affected in M.P. alone at the present dam height and
that atleast 25,000+ oustee families were yet to be rehabilitated. He
added that not even 5% of the affected populations at the present dam
height had shifted to the R&R sites. Sajjanbehan from Pipri,
speaking of the rich cultural and social history of Nimad, lamented the
submergence of this. Shri Motiya from Jangarwa related the woeful tales
of oustees from M.P. who were ‘resettled’ in Gujarat but forced to
return to their original villages due to uncultivable lands being
allotted and security reasons. Shri Devanbhai from Ekkalbara related
the history of denial of land to oustees and stated that not a single
oustee had been given land in M.P. to date. He spoke of the Narmada
Water Disputes Tribunal Award (NWDTA) and Supreme Court judgments that
made land for land mandatory and yet the government had resorted to
cash compensation illegally. He also spoke of the rampant corruption in
the Special Rehabilitation Package which runs into atleast 100 crores.
Shri Madubahi, from village Chikhalda, spoke about the realities of the
fishing and boat communities on the banks of the Narmada whose
livelihood was getting robbed and yet no rehabilitation was in sight.
He warned against the introduction of contractors for fishing in the
Sardar Sarovar reservoir and stated that only the oustee families
should be given this right.
Shri Rajeshbhai an oustee from Bargi dam on the Narmada, lamented the
reality of those displaced by the Bargi dam who are, today barely
surviving in the slums of Jabalpur or at the banks of the reservoir.
In conclusion it was stated forcefully before the Panel that the
government cannot be allowed to get away with such blatant and large
scale submergence of rights of adivasis, farmers and other communities
and that no further construction can be allowed until and unless all
oustees were rehabilitated in accordance with the law. Shri S.C. Behar,
speaking on behalf of the panelists, stated that even though the
government had made decent R&R polices on paper, which the Supreme
Court has upheld, its implementation left lots to be desired. He was
especially concerned about the blatant nature of violations in Madhya
Pradesh where there was no R&R site for several adivasis villages
and where there were R&R sites, no land was available! He promised,
on behalf of the Panel, to raise the various problems in R&R with
the respective governments and offer recommendations for solving the
same and hoped that the governments would, at least now, respond to the
realities on ground and, obeying the law, undertake the just and
necessary rehabilitation of all oustees in the Sardar Sarovar
project.
Ashish Mandloi, Kamla Yadav, Clifton, Umesh Patidar, Medha Patkar
|